Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the improved risk bound \({\text {TVaR}}_{\lambda }\left (\Sigma _{T,(\rho _{k}),\nu }^{c}\right)\) with the standard comonotonic risk bound \({\text {TVaR}}_{\lambda }\left (\Sigma _{T}^{c}\right)\) for TVaRλ(ΣT) for T=1 year, resp., T=2 years, for different levels λ and for different ν.

From: Upper risk bounds in internal factor models with constrained specification sets

T=1 year

\({\text {TVaR}}_{\lambda }\left (\Sigma _{254,(\rho _{k}),\nu }^{c}\right)\)

\({\text {TVaR}}_{\lambda }\left (\Sigma _{254}^{c}\right)\)

\({\mathbb {E}} [\Sigma _{254}]=1536\)

ν=3

ν=10

ν=∞

 

λ=0.5

1878

(11.1%)

1876

(11.5%)

1873

(12.1%)

1920

λ=0.8

2218

(12.4%)

2213

(12.9%)

2208

(13.6%)

2314

λ=0.9

2452

(13.1%)

2445

(13.6%)

2437

(14.4%)

2589

λ=0.95

2678

(13.6%)

2669

(14.3%)

2657

(15.2%)

2858

λ=0.99

3195

(14.7%)

3179

(15.6%)

3155

(16.8%)

3482

λ=0.995

3419

(15.2%)

3400

(16.1%)

3369

(17.5%)

3757

λ=0.999

3955

(16.4%)

3929

(17.3%)

3876

(19.1%)

4430

T=2 years

\({\text {TVaR}}_{\lambda }(\Sigma _{508,(\rho _{k}),\nu }^{c})\)

\({\text {TVaR}}_{\lambda }(\Sigma _{508}^{c})\)

\({\mathbb {E}} [\Sigma _{508}]=1528\)

ν=3

ν=10

ν=∞

 

λ=0.5

1992

(12.5%)

1990

(13.0%)

1987

(13.5%)

2059

λ=0.8

2498

(14.8%)

2491

(15.3%)

2484

(16.0%)

2666

λ=0.9

2865

(15.9%)

2856

(16.5%)

2844

(17.2%)

3118

λ=0.95

3233

(16.8%)

3219

(17.5%)

3201

(18.4%)

3577

λ=0.99

4114

(18.5%)

4085

(19.4%)

4048

(20.6%)

4700

λ=0.995

4513

(19.0%)

4473

(20.1%)

4428

(21.3%)

5215

λ=0.999

5500

(20.4%)

5422

(22.0%)

5353

(23.4%)

6520

  1. The relative DU-improvement given by \(1-\left ({\text {TVaR}}_{\lambda }\left (\Sigma _{T,(\rho _{k}),\nu }^{c}\right)-{\mathbb {E}}[\Sigma _{T}]\right)/\left ({\text {TVaR}}_{\lambda }\left (\Sigma _{T}^{c}\right)-{\mathbb {E}}[\Sigma _{T}]\right)\) is displayed in parentheses